ONE SOURCE OF TRUTH · FROM STRATEGY TO TASK

The AI-powered command centre for strategic programs execution

One live platform from strategy to task — with Polaris, an AI advisory board that tells you what's happening and what to do next.

Book a live demo Explore the platform
app.thelodestarai.com/executive
Lodestar
WORKSPACE
Masar UAE 2030
Search…⌘K
Home
My Work99+
STRATEGY
Strategy Map
KPIs & Value
Portfolios
DELIVERY
Projects
Planning & Dependencies
Resources
CONTROL
Financials
Risks, Issues & Actions
Governance
INTELLIGENCE & MONITORING
Reports & Dashboards
What-If Studio
Analytics
AI Advisors
Executive PortfolioLIVE · WED 10:42
Program progress
50 %/ 59 plan
↘ -8.9 pts behind plan
● AT RISK
Resources gap (FTE)
-98 FTE
5 overloaded · 43 supply / 141 demand
Budget burn YTD
5.7B/ $3.73B plan
↗ +30.3% forecast vs plan
Value realized
16.9B/ $11.3B
↝ 40% captured
Program Timeline — pillar roll-up⊘ 34 DELAYED⚠ 3 AT RISK✓ 35 ON TRACK
TODAY
Energy Transition & Decarb…
65%
Trade, Ports & Logistics
41%
Urban Communities & Real Es…
38%
Financial Services & Capital
57%
Technology & Data Platform
74%
People, Emiratisation & Cult…
34%
Pillar-rolled-up Gantt — click a pillar to drill into initiatives, then projects + activities
Polaris · CoS6 · today
Simulate all moves
Order a verified progress refresh across the 91 unreported projectsIMMEDIATE
91 of 100 projects last reported 105 days ago with zero recorded velocity — no rebaseline or recovery play can be priced until this lands.
CSPO+ CGCOOwner: Head of PMO · Due: 2W
Re-engineer the SOC Trust & Safety chain before its dates hardenIMMEDIATE
The four-activity chain spans 2,090 days with zero float — rebuilding it now costs a planning session; in 2028 it costs the deadline.
SHOWING ALL 6VIEW ALL
ASK THE PORTFOLIO A QUESTION
Polaris — AI Program Advisor
{{ m.text }}
{{ m.role }}

{{ m.text }}

{{ m.donutTitle }}
{{ m.donutCentre }}
{{ sl.label }} {{ sl.v }} {{ sl.pct }}
INITIATIVE EAC VAR STATUS
{{ r.name }} {{ r.eac }} {{ r.varc }} {{ r.status }}
{{ m.chartTitle }} {{ m.chartUnit }}
{{ b.v }}
{{ b.label }}
{{ it.n }} {{ it.t }}
{{ m.foot }} {{ m.trace }}
{{ m.offerText }}
Polaris is reading the portfolio…

Demo thread on sample portfolio data — in your workspace every figure traces to its own record.

GENERATED OUTPUT {{ deckBadge }}
Portfolio-Review-Cycle-34.pptx
PORTFOLIO REVIEW · CYCLE 34
Where the $2.3B sits, and what is at risk
$2.3B
Pillar 1 · Digital core27%
Pillar 2 · Infrastructure23%
Pillar 3 · Services18%
Pillar 4-6 · Other32%
6 DATES AT RISK $112M EAC BREACH $26M RECOVERY
THE PROBLEM

Program truth today is scattered across a dozen tools and files

QUESTION 01
Are we on track — and why?

Today's honest answer: "nobody's quite sure — give us a few days."

QUESTION 02
What's coming — and where will it bite?

Today: the warning sits in an unread risk log until the steering committee.

QUESTION 03
What should we do about it?

Today: wait for next month's deck — or the consultants.

THE CHALLENGE TODAY This is how most strategic programs run right now — the "system" is a desk of files that don't talk to each other.
delivery_plan_v14_FINAL_(2).xlsx
Milestone 4.2Jun 1280%?Booth cabins#REF!
3 VERSIONS IN CIRCULATION
Strategy_Refresh_FY26_vFinal.pptx
KPI targets re-typed each cycle — no link to delivery
DISCONNECTED FROM THE PLAN
RE: RE: FW: milestone status??
"Can anyone confirm the Phase 2 date before Thursday's SteerCo? The deck still shows March numbers…"
UNANSWERED · 12 DAYS
#program-updates · 96 unread
Progress self-reported, unverified
NO ACTION ITEMS
risk_register_Q2.xlsx
Row 47: HIGH — vendor slippage on critical path
LAST OPENED 5 WEEKS AGO
Board_Pack_June_v3_JT_edits.pptx
STALE ON ARRIVAL
RE-KEYED BY HAND
COPY-PASTED
RECONCILED MANUALLY
Are we on track — and why?
NOBODY IS QUITE SURE
What is coming next?
THE WARNING SITS UNREAD
What should we do about it?
WAIT FOR NEXT MONTH'S DECK
ILLUSTRATIVE — THE TYPICAL PROGRAM ESTATE, BEFORE LODESTAR
EVERY HANDOFF IS MANUAL — AND PERSONAL
Chief Strategy / Transformation Officer
STRATEGY DEFINITION & ALIGNMENT
"I wait for the team to hand-assemble everything from stale slides."
MANUAL
PMO / Program Lead
PROJECT PLANNING & SETUP
"I rebuild the plan by hand, then lose track of where it's heading."
MANUAL
Delivery / Project Manager
DELIVERY MONITORING & UPDATES
"My week is chasing updates across five tools."
MANUAL
Value & Benefits Manager
VALUE REALIZATION TRACKING
"I track benefits in a sheet nobody links to delivery."
MANUAL
PMO Reporting Analyst
REPORTING & BOARD PACKS
"I lose nights rebuilding the board pack by hand."
MANUAL
Chief Strategy / Transformation Officer
INSIGHTS & FORESIGHT PLANNING
"I see problems when they land, not before."
THE SOLUTION THE HAPPY PATH · STRATEGY TO TASK

Most tools solve a slice — Lodestar runs the whole spectrum

STRATEGY
KPIS
PLANNING
DELIVERY
FINANCE
RESOURCES
GOVERNANCE
REPORTING
INTELLIGENCE
Schedulers
one slice
Work tools
one slice
OKR platforms
two slices
PPM suites
the middle
BI tools
read-only
Lodestar
THE FULL SPECTRUM · ONE CONNECTED MODEL
Polaris
+ THE AGENTIC & INTELLIGENCE LAYER ON TOP · WATCHES · RECOMMENDS · SIMULATES · ACTS
what no one else has
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL · ASSISTED & AI-POWERED WORKFLOW
Strategy definition & alignment
Project planning & setup
Delivery monitoring & updates
Value realization tracking
Reporting & board packs
Insights & foresight planning
THE HAPPY PATH · WHO IT'S FOR

Give strategy, transformation and the PMO back their week

Chief Strategy / Transformation Officer
STRATEGY DEFINITION & ALIGNMENT
"I open a live dashboard instead of waiting on hand-assembled stale slides."
AUTOMATED
PMO / Program Lead
PROJECT PLANNING & SETUP
"The plan lives on one scheduling engine — no versions drifting in spreadsheets."
AUTOMATED
Delivery / Project Manager
DELIVERY MONITORING & UPDATES
"I reply to one email — the platform updates the plan and chases the approvals."
AUTOMATED
Value & Benefits Manager
VALUE REALIZATION TRACKING
"Every KPI is wired to the initiatives that move it — not an orphaned sheet."
AUTOMATED
PMO Reporting Analyst
REPORTING & BOARD PACKS
"The board pack builds in seconds from the same live numbers — no more lost nights."
WHERE THE WEEK GOES

Stop reconciling the past. Start deciding the future

The assembly work is the job today. Automate it and the same team spends its week on the work only people can do.

Firefighting that shrinks
The platform does the assembly
Reconciling versions
−85%
Assembling board packs
−90%
Chasing status updates
−77%
Manual reporting cycles
−83%
Judgment that grows
The week the team was hired for
Strategy & scenario thinking
+5×
Foresight & early warning
+6×
Course correction
+3×
Stakeholder & board dialogue
+2×
THE SHIFT From a team that reports on the program to a team that steers it
01 · STRATEGY & KPIS

One connected model from pillar to evidence

A slipping task tints its pillar amber the moment it happens — not at month-end.

  • Weighted roll-up by effort or budget — the basis disclosed
  • Every KPI carries a named owner and required evidence
  • Early warning before the review, not after it
Strategy hierarchy
PILLARCustomer Experience72% · AMBER
INITIATIVEFaster passenger proceduresAMBER
PROJECTProcedure-areas expansion, Phase 2SPI 0.91
MILESTONEBooth cabins commissionedSLIPPED +9d
TASKLane signalling integration testevidence ✓
Gantt — critical pathBASELINE FROZEN · WHAT-IF ON
Design freeze
Civil works
Systems install
Integration test
Go-live
■ CRITICAL PATH ▨ WHAT-IF: +9d → FINISH 28 JUN MSPDI ⇄ · P6 .XER ⇄
02 · PLAN & SCHEDULE

A full critical-path engine with what-if before you commit

Move a date, see the new finish date on the spot — the baseline stays frozen.

  • Float and near-critical, live
  • Changes commit through the same governed, audited path
03 · DELIVER & GOVERN

No-code stage gates where nothing stalls silently

Every gate carries its approver, evidence and SLA — overdue approvals escalate on their own.

  • Status is computed from dates and approved evidence — never typed
  • Time-boxed, scoped, capped and revocable delegation of authority
  • Committee decisions and actions linked to the work they govern
Stage-gate lifecycle — Procedure-areas expansion
Initiation ✓
Planning ✓
Execution
M&C
Closure
Gate 3 — Execution readinessAWAITING APPROVAL · SLA 2d
SAApprover: Steering Committee · evidence: readiness checklist ✓ · budget confirmation ✓
ESCALATIONUnanswered in 2 days → escalates to Program Board automatically
AUDIT #4821 · hash-chained · initiated by k.alshamsi · 10:31
Budget Utilization
Burn + ETC = Forecast Final · variance vs plan
CURRENT BURN
$1.52B
41% of plan spent
COMMITTED
$1.36B
obligated · CPI 0.92
EST. TO COMPLETE
$3.36B
forecast − burn
FORECAST FINAL
$4.88B
+30.2% vs 14.0B plan
BURN VS PLAN VS FORECAST
— Actual-- Plan-- Forecast
Capacity vs demand
Team × month — mean per-person load · click a row for people
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
SDAIA ·11p
67
77
79
82
88
96
DGA ·4p
70
79
84
89
86
67
NCA ·9p
62
63
73
74
74
69
MCIT ·2p
16
19
23
29
40
41
10 teams · 13 months · load 42.2%<6060-8080-95>95
⚑ Peak gap: -98 FTE across 12 roles — $2.1M to fill the top compliance gap.
04 · MONEY & PEOPLE

An early-warning system, not a rear-view mirror

Earned Value engine turns the numbers into an early warning.

  • Budget · secured · committed · actual · forecast · variance
  • Overload shows on the peak week — not hidden in an average
  • Financial and Human capital oversight
05 · REPORT & DECIDE

Board reporting in seconds, in four formats and five languages

Custom Dashboards and Report Studio over the live model — a report can never disagree with a dashboard.

  • PDF · PPTX · Word · HTML — and AR ⇄ EN
  • Self-distributing each cycle, archived in-region
  • Board-grade portfolio, program and project templates
Report Studio — Q2 board packGENERATED IN 4.2s
KPI TILE
72%
Portfolio health
GANTT SNAPSHOT
RISK REGISTER
PDF PPTX WORD HTML AR ⇄ EN
All forums SteerCo Risk & Compliance Committee Delivery Board Investment & Capital
Risk & Compliance Committee
Monthly · 2nd ThursdayChair O. Farouk8 membersNext 11 Sept5 open · 1 overdue
Members8Meetings6Decisions14Actions9Documents11
MEETING#5 Session 05 — minutes recorded · 2 decisions · 3 actions raisedCompleted
DECISIONRCC-D-014Adopt NESA control baseline v2→ Project · Falcon ERP
ACTIONRCC-A-021Close IA audit finding #7 evidence pack · O. FaroukDue 4 Aug — Delayed
MINUTES → DECISIONS → ACTIONS → THE PLAN · ONE HASH-CHAINED RECORD
06 · GOVERNANCE & FORUMS

One governance spine — forums, decisions and actions, all linked

Every forum — SteerCo to Risk Committee — holds its members, meetings, decisions and actions in one place; every decision links to the plan item it moves.

  • Minutes become owned, dated decisions and actions — nothing evaporates after the meeting
  • Every decision carries a reference and links to the project or pillar it moves
  • Overdue actions are chased and escalated automatically — across every forum
INSIDE THE PLATFORM
Risk register — portfolio heat map
2
1
3
4
2
5
6
8
1
9
3
FORESIGHT FEED
2 high risks on the critical chain — mitigations stalled 30 days
Predictive: Phase 2 finish trending +9d, confidence 82%
What-if — delay "Systems install" +14d
New finish date28 JUN → 12 JUL
Cascade7 TASKS · 2 PROJECTS
Near-critical+3 TASKS
Cost impact$560K
DiscardApply via governance →
BASELINE FROZEN · SANDBOX — LIVE DATA UNTOUCHED
Ask Polaris
Which projects will miss Q3 — and why?
Two: Procedure-areas Phase 2 (SPI 0.91, milestone slipped +9d) and Lane signalling — the shared cause is one systems lead at 140% load on both critical paths.
SCHEDULE ENGINERESOURCE MODELGROUNDED · CITED
ANSWERS FROM ENGINE-COMPUTED NUMBERS — NEVER INVENTED
Schedule — critical-path Gantt
Activity level · drag a date and the chain recalculates
QUARTER CRITICAL PATH ONLY 51 MS
Mobilisation
100%
Sourcing & Award
81%
Design Sign-off
19%
Build & Configure
13%
Integration
13%
Zero float on 4 chain nodes — the next surprise moves the end date
Delivery board — activities & tasks
Drag a card to move it — approval steps ask for confirmation
BOARD TIMELINE CALENDAR
In Progress4
Design Authority Sign-off (M3)
DelayedOverdue
19 MarB. Rahman19%
Build & Configure (M4)
Delayed
3 JulM. Subramanian13%
Completed1
Mobilisation & Baseline (M1)
CompletedHigh
12 SepH. Al Hosani100%
Approved0
No cards
CARD MOVES WRITE STRAIGHT TO THE SCHEDULE — NO RE-ENTRY
Portfolios — every accountability lens
Departments · pillars · initiatives · custom cuts of the same projects
DEPARTMENTS 15 PILLARS 8 INITIATIVES 32
64
On track 35% Delayed 24% At risk 12% Not started 29%
Cybersecurity28%
9 projects
BEHIND−23% variance$91M
Data & AI42%
12 projects
BEHIND−13% variance$122M
Energy & Utilities60%
9 projects
AT RISK−5% variance$96M
ONE PROJECT SET · EVERY LENS ROLLS UP THE SAME NUMBERS
POLARIS · THE AGENTIC LAYER

A standing board of AI advisors reading everything, every cycle

Seven AI chiefs read the whole program every cycle — a Chief of Staff de-conflicts them into one brief leadership acts from.

Chief, Financial

Where the money is really going — overruns, burn ahead of progress, EAC breaches.

POLARIS·CFO — CYCLE 34● LIVE
Initiative 12: burn runs 34% ahead of earned value — EAC breaks plan by $56M in 6 wks. Rebaseline before the Q3 gate
CPI 0.88EAC +6.2%
Chief, Strategy & Planning

Whether the portfolio still serves the strategy — and the spend that drifted off it.

POLARIS·CSPO — CYCLE 34● LIVE
Pillar 3 drift: 2 initiatives ($22M) advance no KPI — fold into Pillar 5 or stop; frees 11 FTE for the critical chain
DRIFT $22M2 ORPHANED
Chief, People

Capacity and key-person risk before either becomes the reason a date slips.

POLARIS·CPO — CYCLE 34● LIVE
One systems lead carries 3 critical paths at 140% — a 2-wk absence slips go-live by 6 wks. Cover costs $163K/yr
-98 FTE1 SPOF
Chief, Risk

Which exposures actually threaten delivery — and the mitigations that quietly stalled.

POLARIS·CRO — CYCLE 34● LIVE
R-207 exposure doubled while its mitigation idled 30 days — $850K contingency draw if it lands. Escalate to SteerCo
2 HIGH30D STALE
Chief, Excellence & Performance

Which greens to believe — watermelon projects and quiet performance drift.

POLARIS·CXO — CYCLE 34● LIVE
Program B: green 9 cycles straight, data-trust 41% — no evidence in 5 wks, spend ahead of progress. Order a verified refresh
3 WATERMELONSTRUST 41%
Chief, Growth & Commercial

The value case — benefit slippage, value-at-risk and commercial leakage.

POLARIS·CGCO — CYCLE 34● LIVE
Benefit B-12 ($12M) slips 2 quarters — the value case falls below hurdle. Re-sequence delivery or re-scope the benefit
$12M VAR2 BENEFITS
Chief, Digital & Innovation

Integration risk and tech debt sitting on the delivery path.

POLARIS·CDIO — CYCLE 34● LIVE
Legacy ERP API caps throughput and blocks 2 launches — a 3-wk adapter now avoids a 4-month slip in 2027
2 BLOCKEDDEBT RISING
+ Chief of Staff

Reads all seven and de-conflicts them into one brief — the single page leadership acts from.

POLARIS·CoS — CYCLE 34● LIVE
6 moves this cycle, de-conflicted & priced: 2 immediate, 3 scheduled, 1 board decision — $26M of recovery on the table
6 MOVES1 BRIEF
HIGH REBASELINE CHAIN SEGMENT P25 National SOC & Threat Intelligence −90d
ISSUE

The chain is spaced at a near-exact 143-day cadence with zero float on every node — the signature of template sequencing, not estimated durations. 2,090 days with no float and no overlap has zero absorption capacity, and it terminates exactly on the program window end date.

ACTION

Re-plan the segment with bottom-up durations from the P25 delivery team, deliberately engineering float into the two handover points. Deliver a board-approved chain baseline before the Q4 2026 planning close.

PRECONDITIONS
P25 delivery team available for a two-week bottom-up estimating exercise
Portfolio data refresh completed so the estimate is built on current reality
Board accepts a revised chain baseline rather than the template dates
Budget: $0 · raw Staffing: 0 HC · CPO ⚗ Simulate impact
Master scenario — 2026-08-13 TRACE 17 ● SANDBOX — NOT COMMITTED
Engine outputs reflect this scenario. Every changed field is traced before → after, and nothing touches live data until a human applies it.
P25National SOC & Threat Intelligence · Target date2029-02-142028-11-16
P14National Foundation Model · Target date2027-01-232028-03-30
P44Sovereign Cryptography · Baselinevoidrebaselined
P90National AI Standards · Chain float0d62d
CRITICAL PATH −90d FLOAT +62d EAC unchanged 13 more changes
Apply under governance Discard SEALED IN AI DECISION LOG
Predictive delay

Projects the finish date from the performance trend — flagging slippage weeks before a deadline is missed.

Anomaly detection

Ten typed detectors: progress spikes, stagnation, budget-burn mismatch, duplicate reports, ghost projects, velocity collapse, ignored high risks, stale approvals — plus two anti-gaming classes.

Cascade & Dependency Hunter

When one date moves, the ripple is simulated portfolio-wide — and AI finds the undeclared links, priced in days of end-date impact.

Watermelon detection

Deterministic data-trust scoring catches projects green outside, red inside — stale reports, spend ahead of progress, claims with no evidence.

THE LOOP NO OTHER PLATFORM CLOSES
AI that acts, under governance
1 · RECOMMEND

An advisor proposes a concrete, quantified move

2 · SIMULATE

Previewed in a sandbox; second-order effects computed by math

3 · APPLY

Two-phase, drift-checked; permissions equal the manual routes

4 · AUDIT

Sealed in an immutable AI Decision Log on the hash chain

5 · MEASURE

Weeks later: improved, unchanged or worsened — advisors calibrate

Polaris — AI Program Advisor
{{ m.text }}
{{ m.role }}

{{ m.text }}

{{ m.donutTitle }}
{{ m.donutCentre }}
{{ sl.label }} {{ sl.v }} {{ sl.pct }}
INITIATIVE EAC VAR STATUS
{{ r.name }} {{ r.eac }} {{ r.varc }} {{ r.status }}
{{ m.chartTitle }} {{ m.chartUnit }}
{{ b.v }}
{{ b.label }}
{{ it.n }} {{ it.t }}
{{ m.foot }} {{ m.trace }}
{{ m.offerText }}
Polaris is reading the portfolio…

Demo thread on sample portfolio data — in your workspace every figure traces to its own record.

GENERATED OUTPUT {{ deckBadge }}
Portfolio-Review-Cycle-34.pptx
PORTFOLIO REVIEW · CYCLE 34
Where the $2.3B sits, and what is at risk
$2.3B
Pillar 1 · Digital core27%
Pillar 2 · Infrastructure23%
Pillar 3 · Services18%
Pillar 4-6 · Other32%
6 DATES AT RISK $112M EAC BREACH $26M RECOVERY
POLARIS · AGENTS BUILT INTO THE MODEL

Not a chat layer bolted on — agents running inside the model itself

Agents read and write your live plan through the same permissions, approvals and audit trail people use.

Agents that execute inside the governance

The agent doesn't hand you text to copy. It stages the actual change in a sandbox and waits for a human signature.

POLARIS·CFO AGENT · CYCLE 34HIGH
Move $1.2M from contingency on Initiative 9 — EAC recovers to plan
Ran the engine, not a guess17 changes traced
End date−90d
Your live datauntouched
Apply via governance Discard
KANothing moves until K. Al Shamsi approves — same permissions as the manual route
Agents read the updates your team already writes

Send the weekly update as a document or plain text. The agent extracts typed edits on the plan; a human approves them.

WEEKLY UPDATE · PDFM. Subramanian · 09:14
"Build & Configure slipped — integration testing now starts 3 Jul, we're at about 13%. Still short one systems lead." — extracted from the weekly update
AGENT TYPES 3 EDITS
Activity M4 · progress11% → 13%
Integration · start date24 Jun → 3 Jul
Resource gap · systems lead+1 FTE flagged
Approve edits Amend AUDIT #4821 · HASH-CHAINED
Agents rehearse the decision before you take it

The agent forks the whole program, runs the engine on the copy, and writes the committee pack from the result.

AGENT · WHAT-IF STUDIODelay "Systems install" +14d
New finish date28 JUN → 12 JUL
Cascade7 tasks · 2 projects
Near-critical+3 tasks
Cost impact$560K
📄 SteerCo pack PPTX PDF Build pack
BASELINE FROZEN · SANDBOX — LIVE DATA UNTOUCHED
Native tools, not API calls

Agents invoke the same scheduling engine, EVM and resource model the screens run on — the numbers cannot diverge.

An agent's permissions are its owner's

No agent reads or writes anything its human owner couldn't — RBAC is enforced on the agent, not around it.

Every run is reversible

Two-phase, drift-checked apply, sealed in an immutable decision log — every agent action can be traced and undone.

Agents grade their own calls

Weeks later the engine measures what each applied move actually did — an advisor that was wrong loses weight.

See it on your own program

A 30-minute working session on your own program data — strategy to task.

Request a live walkthrough
sales@thelodestarai.com